Qurilish tarmog‘ida kichik va yirik biznes subyektlari integratsiyasining strategik yo‘nalishlari va iqtisodiy samaradorlik modellari

Abstract

Mazkur maqolada qurilish tarmog‘ida kichik va yirik biznes subyektlari o‘rtasidagi tarkibiy mutanosiblik va integratsiya samaradorligini oshirish masalalari tadqiq etilgan. Tadqiqotda hududiy qurilish ishlarining dinamikasi tahlil qilinib, subyektlar o‘rtasidagi maqbul nisbatni aniqlash bo‘yicha mualliflik modeli taklif etilgan. Olingan natijalar qurilish klasterlari va raqamli integratsiyani rivojlantirish orqali tarmoq rentabelligini oshirishga xizmat qiladi.

Keywords

qurilish iqtisodiyotibiznes integratsiyasisubpudratiqtisodiy modelsinergiya effektiBIM-texnologiyalari
Zamonaviy iqtisodiy sharoitda qurilish tarmog‘i milliy iqtisodiyotning strategik drayveri va ijtimoiy barqarorlikning asosiy omili bo‘lib xizmat qilmoqda. Mazkur tarmoq ishlab chiqarish infratuzilmasini yaratish, aholining turar-joyga bo‘lgan ehtiyojini qondirish, sanoat va xizmat ko‘rsatish sohalari faoliyati uchun moddiy asos shakllantirish orqali iqtisodiy o‘sishni ta’minlashda muhim rol o‘ynaydi. So‘nggi yillarda mamlakatimizda qurilish sohasini tubdan isloh qilish borasida muhim me’yoriy-huquqiy asoslar yaratildi. Xususan, O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 27-noyabrdagi PF-6119- sonli «Qurilish sohasida davlat boshqaruvi tizimini tubdan takomillashtirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida»- gi Farmoni hamda 2022–2026-yillarga mo‘ljallangan Yangi O‘zbekistonning taraqqiyot strategiyasida sohani raqamlashtirish, shaffoflikni ta’minlash va tadbirkorlik subyektlari uchun teng raqobat muhitini yaratish ustuvor vazifa etib belgilangan

References

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasining 2018-yil 20-oktabrdagi 841-sonli “2030 yilgacha bo‘lgan davrda barqaror rivojlanish sohasidagi milliy maqsad va vazifalarni amalga oshirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida”gi Qarori, O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2022- yil 28-yanvardagi “2022 - 2026 yillarga mo‘ljallangan yangi O‘zbekistonning taraqqiyot strategiyasi to‘g‘risida”gi PF-60-sonli Farmoni., Coase R. H. The Nature of the Firm // Economica. – 1937. – Vol. 4(16). – pp. 386–405., Williamson O. E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. – New York: Free Press, 1985., Porter M. E. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition // Harvard Business Review. – 1998., North D. C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990., Schumpeter J. A. The Theory of Economic Development. – Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1934., Sherzodjonovich, H. U. (2024). ANALYSIS OF FREE ECONOMIC ZONES IN UZBEKISTAN. Economics and Innovative Technologies, 12(5), 88-95., Khabibjonov, U., & Sakibayeva, T. (2024). THE STRUCTURE OF PIRLS INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM. THE ROLE IN THE COUNTRY’S ECONOMY AND EDUCATION SYSTEM. Science and innovation, 3(B7), 55-59.

Rights & License

CREATIVECOMMONSCCBY
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

International Nordic University Scientific Journal

Advancing knowledge through peer-reviewed research and academic excellence.

Contact

  • Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • info@nordicuniversity.org

Social Media

© 2026 International Nordic University Scientific Journal. All rights reserved.
Sitemap International Nordic University, Tashkent