Factors Influencing Kazakhstani Youth’s Perception of Corruption and how it Demonstrates their Moral Development

Arna Rakhimbergenova

doi:https://journal.nordicuniversity.org/

AR

Arna Rakhimbergenova

yo'q

article.coauthors: Arna Rakhimbergenova

article.abstract

Corruption in Kazakhstan, rooted in Soviet history, remains a major issue. This study explores factors shaping youth attitudes toward corruption and how these reflect the nation’s moral development. Using an inductive, mixed-methods approach, it includes a random-sample survey and semi-structured interviews with NIS PhM Astana students (grades 9–12). Findings show corruption is normalized, with key causes being peer/superior pressure and bureaucratic inefficiency. Youth often feel hopeless, but media influence is strong. Participants appear to be at the 3rd–4th stages of moral development. Suggested reforms include strengthening media freedom and reforming courts and police. Limitations include a narrow sample. Future studies should expand across more regions and schools to inform effective anti-corruption education and democratic reforms.

article.keywords

Moral Development

mixed-methods

Corruption

Kazakhstan

Youth’s

Ideally, people take responsibility for corruption at all levels. Experts argue that state policies shape public attitudes and future behavior (Begovic, 2005). In reality, sarcastic and negative views on corruption dominate social media and news. People’s comprehension of corruption is shaped by their moral values and principles and affects their future corruption-related crime behavior (Enste & Heldman, 2017). This highlights the need to study both motives and the moral beliefs behind corruption.

article.references

Begovic, B. (2005). Corruption: Concepts, types, causes, and consequences. Center for the Opening and Development of Latin America, 2-8. Damla, K. (2022). Perspective chapter: From ancient times to modern world – Corruptus. In IntechOpen, 1. Enste, D., & Heldman, C. (2017). Causes and consequences of corruption: An overview of empirical results. Cologne Institute for Economic Research, 27-28, 35-37. Lillis, K. (2022). Bribery is booming in Kazakhstan amid anti-corruption drive. Eurasianet. Lubin, N. (1995). Central Asians take stock: Reform, corruption, and identity. U.S. Institute of Peace, 6-8, 15-19. Nezhina, T. (2014). Examining the causes of systemic corruption: The case of Kazakhstan. National Research University Higher School of Economics, 10, 13-14. Resimić, R. (2024). Kazakhstan: Overview of corruption and anti-corruption. Transparency International, 11, 17-20. Bogdanov, A. (2024). Kazakhstan: Still no real investigation into the violence against protesters, two years after the January 2022 Events. International Federation for Human Rights. Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. H. (1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory Into Practice, 16(2), 53–59. Light, M. (2013). Police reforms in the Republic of Georgia: the convergence of domestic and foreign policy in an anti-corruption drive. Policing and Society, 24(3), 318–345. Eriksson, F. (2017). The rapid economic liberalisation and ruthless fight against corruption in Georgia. Interview with Dr. Tamara Kovziridze. U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. University of Nebraska, 41-42, 201-203.

article.license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

article.license.text